By the time, Vista was launched, majority of the public was used to XP, and some were even hesitant to switch to Vista. Even though the number of Vista users surpassed Microsoft expectations, they did not surpass the number of XP users. Most people prefer XP, over Vista, claiming that is it much more user friendly and efficient that Vista. They also criticize Vista for have additional hardware requirements that XP.
Microsoft included a number of additional upgrades and features in Vista refer table , some of which users claimed impeded usage instead of enhancing it, e. The UAC, meant to block software from silently gaining administrator privileges without the user's knowledge, has been criticized for generating prompts at every turn possible, even at basic commands such moving something in the Start Menu.
All in all, Vista failed to persuade users to shift from XP, with many users even skipping Vista entirely and waiting for the next thing to come along. This is hardly an achievement, considering. And i have rund Vista 32bit and 64bit service pack 1 and i can say vista sucks i have problems with some of my software updated for vista and games don't run or they run but very crappy.
So i say stick to Xp for now and Please dont run service pack 3 there is something wrong with it, i don't know what but me and some others have notice some problems with it performance and networking. I think Vista are laggy software. Vulcan64, i recomment u to return to teh old and good and really fast DOS.
Remember it? Switch to MAC or Linux. At least they aren't just trying to scam everyone out of their money, they deliver results and even have better support options. Whatever brainwashed opinions you have that Windows is a good brand, it's not true.. Can you do benchmark tests, with service pack 1, with actually address the issue of slow file operations. Vista, actually uses all spare memory for caching, unlike xp which didn't and thus you had unused ram, I would rather have memory been used rather idle.
What if your usage pattern varies much? You won't benefit at all from superfetching. With this latest transition, however, many people have been asking whether it really is worth the trouble to upgrade. To answer that question, here's a head- to-head comparison between the current incumbent, Windows XP , and the newly arrived successor, Windows Vista.
You may be wondering, why make this comparison now? With the recent release of Service Pack 1 for Vista, the new Windows has more or less settled into its permanent form, giving us a chance to realistically compare the two systems on their own merits.
Comparing Vista to XP in the first months of its release was not a valid measure of their relative merits, as many issues not under MS's control were causing Vista to misbehave. Now though, issues relating to driver support, third-party vendor foul-ups, and other such teething issues have been mostly resolved. For clarity's sake, this comparison will be broken up by topic, covering each of the major functions that a modern operating system is expected to fulfill.
Following that, there will be a list of any miscellaneous issues for each OS that weren't covered in the general overview. So, let's crack open the crypt, and see what shambling horrors emerge! One of the first things people notice about an operating system is how it presents itself. As much as people might like to say they don't care, appearance does effect our perception of how a system works.
More than just graphical style though, look and feel is also about the responsiveness of the system. How fast do menus open when I click on them? Am I getting enough feedback on what the system is doing when it's busy? Does the system present me with the information I need in a useful manner?
All of these are questions that are important to look and feel.
0コメント